Charlevoix County 90th District Court - Judge Angela Lasher
Charlevoix - Boyne City - East Jordan

Call Me: 248-924-9458
​Email Me: [email protected]

​At our firm, we take a different approach to criminal defense. We understand that our clients are good-hearted, caring individuals who respect the law and never intended to find themselves on the wrong side of it. We strive to lead with empathy and understanding, recognizing that our clients are more often frightened and embarrassed than they are "criminals".

​We work with a diverse range of clients, treating each one as a partner in their case. Together, we take a proactive approach, focusing on the client's journey and how they ended up in their current situation. While Attorney Jonathan Paul is a former prosecutor with over a decade of criminal defense experience, we avoid using the "criminal" label with our clients. Instead, we empower them to take control of their situation and make a true impression on the court system.

Our goal is to provide our clients with the tools they need to demonstrate what they've learned from their incident and show where they are going in the future. We help them to develop a powerful exit strategy that will enable them to navigate the criminal justice system with confidence and achieve the best possible outcome.

​I view my role as both an attorney and a coach for my client. Coaching is the art of facilitating another person's learning, development, well-being and performance, which as an attorney is my client. Coaching raises self-awareness and identifies choices. Through coaching, my clients are able to find their own solutions, develop their own skills, and change their own attitudes and behaviors while tackling a challenging moment in life. The whole aim of coaching is to close the gap between people's potential and their current state, and help clients use their cases as moments of reflection and growth.

We take pride in hearing prosecutors and judges praise our clients for stepping up and taking control of their situation. Our clients do amazing things in the criminal justice system because they are not "criminals"; they are mere visitors who made a mistake. By approaching each case with empathy, understanding, and a focus on the client's journey, we are able to help our clients move forward and achieve the best possible outcome.

​If charged with a misdemeanor DUI the charge will either be Impaired Driving, Operating While Intoxicated, Super Drunk, Operating With Presence of Drugs or Minor BAC Zero Tolerance, Child Endangerment or with a prior, OWI 2nd Offense or 3rd Offense which would be a felony.

When charged with a drunk driving offense in Michigan, you're fighting for your survival. Your freedom, license, career, family reputation and your future are on the line. I am the author the Michigan DUI Playbook. For a comprehensive website on drunk driving: www.michiganduiplaybook.com

​Facing a drunk driving charge can be a daunting experience. However, having an attorney who uses the power of empathy and compassion can make a world of difference in the outcome of your case. In Michigan, drunk driving charges can result in serious consequences, including fines, jail time, license suspension, and more. Here's how an attorney can use empathy and compassion to help you in your drunk driving case:
​

1. Understanding the Client's Perspective A skilled attorney will take the time to understand their client's perspective. This includes listening to their side of the story, understanding the circumstances surrounding the drunk driving charge, and taking into account the client's feelings about the situation. By understanding the client's perspective, an attorney can better tailor their defense strategy to the client's specific needs and goals.
2. Reducing the Stigma of a Drunk Driving Charge A drunk driving charge can be stigmatizing and embarrassing. However, an attorney who uses empathy and compassion can help reduce that stigma. By treating the client with respect and empathy, an attorney can help the client feel less ashamed and more willing to actively participate in their defense.
3. Finding Solutions that Work for the Client An attorney who uses empathy and compassion will work to find solutions that work for the client. This includes exploring alternative sentencing options such as rehabilitation programs, community service, or other alternatives to jail time. By doing so, an attorney can help the client avoid the harsh consequences of a drunk driving conviction.
4. Building Trust with the Client Empathy and compassion can also help an attorney build trust with their client. When a client feels that their attorney truly cares about their well-being, they are more likely to be forthcoming about their situation and more willing to work together to find the best possible outcome.
5. Providing Emotional Support A drunk driving charge can be an emotional rollercoaster for the client. An attorney who uses empathy and compassion can provide emotional support to their client throughout the legal process. This includes being available to answer questions, providing reassurance, and helping the client navigate the complex legal system.

An attorney who uses empathy and compassion can make a world of difference in a drunk driving case in Michigan. By understanding the client's perspective, reducing the stigma of a drunk driving charge, finding solutions that work for the client, building trust, and providing emotional support, an attorney can help their client achieve the best possible outcome.

Drunk driving is one of the most common offenses among otherwise law-abiding individuals. A first-time offense can be a shocking, life-altering event for someone who respects the law, values their family, and has a strong moral compass. Understanding why a good person might make the poor choice to drive under the influence requires an exploration of psychological, social, and situational factors. By examining this behavior through the lens of criminological theories and real-world examples, we can better contextualize this mistake, providing insight into how individuals can learn, grow, and prevent recurrence.

---

---

Criminological Theories Applied to Drunk Driving
​
1. Rational Choice Theory (Derek Cornish and Ronald Clarke)
Key Idea: Individuals weigh the perceived risks and rewards of their actions before deciding whether to commit a crime.

• Application to Drunk Driving:
  Many first-time offenders believe they can manage the risks associated with drunk driving, whether due to overconfidence in their sobriety or a lack of awareness about the consequences. They rationalize their decision, often underestimating the potential harm.
• Example of Behavior:
  A professional at a work event has two drinks and decides to drive home because they feel fine and don’t want to leave their car behind. They rationalize, “It’s late, the roads are empty, and I’ve driven after more than this before.” This perceived control over the situation leads to a poor decision.

2. Behavioral Economics (Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky)
Key Idea: Cognitive biases, such as overconfidence or present bias, influence decision-making, often leading to irrational choices.

• Application to Drunk Driving:
  Drunk driving often stems from present bias, where immediate convenience (getting home quickly) outweighs consideration of future consequences (arrest, injury, or death). Alcohol further impairs judgment, exacerbating this tendency.
• Example of Behavior:
  After a stressful day, a parent attends a gathering and has a few drinks. Despite feeling slightly impaired, they prioritize getting home to their children over waiting for a rideshare. The immediate need to be home feels more pressing than the potential risks of driving under the influence.

3. Self-Control Theory (Michael Gottfredson and Travis Hirschi)
Key Idea: Low self-control, often influenced by poor impulse regulation, makes individuals more likely to engage in risky behavior.

• Application to Drunk Driving:
  Alcohol consumption itself diminishes self-control, making it harder for individuals to adhere to their usual values or judgment. For first-time offenders, this temporary loss of control can lead to a choice that is inconsistent with their character.
• Example of Behavior:
  A college graduate celebrating a promotion has several drinks and initially plans to take a rideshare home. However, when leaving the event, they impulsively decide to drive their car home, thinking, “I just want to sleep in my own bed tonight.”

4. Neutralization Theory (Gresham Sykes and David Matza)
Key Idea: People justify their actions through mental techniques that minimize their guilt or responsibility.

• Application to Drunk Driving:
  First-time offenders often rationalize their behavior to themselves, minimizing the harm or responsibility involved. These justifications allow them to reconcile their actions with their otherwise law-abiding self-image.
• Example of Behavior:
  • “I’m just a couple of miles from home; I’ll drive slowly.”
  • “I’m not as drunk as some people who drive all the time. I’m fine.”
  • “It’s not that big of a deal. I’ve handled worse situations.

These thought patterns allow individuals to override their internal moral checks in the moment.

5. General Strain Theory (Robert Agnew)
​Key Idea: Stress or strain, whether emotional, relational, or financial, can lead to deviant behavior as a way to cope.

• Application to Drunk Driving:
  Drunk driving can result from using alcohol as a coping mechanism for unresolved stress or strain, such as job pressure, relationship issues, or financial concerns. The act of driving home becomes part of an attempt to restore normalcy after a difficult day or week.
• Example of Behavior:
  A young professional under intense workplace stress attends a happy hour to unwind. After a few drinks, they drive home because they feel a need to wake up in their own bed and start the next day fresh, minimizing the impact of their stress.

Additional Factors Contributing to Drunk Driving
Situational Influences

Drunk driving often occurs due to situational factors that impair decision-making:

• Lack of a Plan: The individual did not arrange for alternative transportation before drinking.
• Social Pressures: Friends or peers encourage them to drive, downplaying the risks.
• Convenience Over Safety: Driving home seems easier than waiting for a rideshare or leaving the car overnight.

Lessons and Growth Opportunities
For a first-time drunk driving offender, the experience is often a wake-up call or what we might call insight and awareness.

The realization of how close they came to harming themselves or others can be deeply unsettling. Through reflection, accountability, and proactive steps, this moment can become a turning point.

Steps Toward Growth

1. Understanding the “Why"
2. Taking Responsibility
3. Proactive Measures
4. Restoring Trust

Why Understanding These Theories Matters
Drunk driving is rarely the result of intentional recklessness. Instead, it often stems from a convergence of stress, impaired judgment, and situational factors that overwhelm a person’s usual values and decision-making. By understanding the psychological and social dynamics behind this choice, individuals can reflect on their actions, take responsibility, and implement safeguards to ensure it never happens again.

This is the essence of the Empathy-Compassion Defense Matrix—not just addressing just the legal consequences of the act but using the experience to grow, learn, and rebuild trust in oneself and the community. For good people who made a bad choice, this approach offers a path forward, turning a moment of poor judgment into an opportunity for lifelong change.